Industry status for Retail in India might now be considered

In June  2014 I had penned “A Retailer’s wish list to Shri Modi” which was published in ET Retail. Within a span of 100 days I got an update about one of the points highlighted in the wish list.

The Deputy Secretary of the Ministry of Consumer affairs, Food and Public Distribution has written to The Secretary, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion requesting that the proposal of according industry status to retail be discussed and further necessary action to be taken if found to be suitable.

This letter was copied to The Hon'ble Prime Minister of India and myself.

The key highlights of why industry status would be of great help is as follows –

• Would help classify Retail and define different guidelines for the various segments.
• Streamline the licensing and other regulatory systems into a single window.
• Help to enable national platforms like a national registry of products which will make the introduction of computerized billing easier.
• Enable skill and vocational training and employment generation
• Ease of financing as guidelines which are specific to Retail can be notified.

Plus, there are many more game changing implications. I do hope that this Retailer's wish comes true.

I am very impressed and needless to say thrilled to have received this letter copy. Kudos to the Prime Minister and his team for reading and responding to this Retailer.

Click here to read the wish list

Will FDI in Retail happen now?

With a clear majority and a free “hand”, the new government might want to implement some of the things which had to be compromised in the previous innings. One such was the allowing of FDI in Retail without strings such as single brand or cash & carry, etc. Most people in the Retail sector today expect that FDI in Retail would soon be allowed and this would help big developments and also bring in global expertise.

A couple of points in my mind about this development and the expectations from such an outcome –

1. Industry status for Retail is required immediately, thereby enabling Retail to avail various benefits from this. This would do much in addressing several issues related to licensing, statutory matters and more importantly access to credit.
2. Regardless of the industry status, licensing requirements for Retail should be streamlined and unified. Today, depending on the range of products one has in a store as many as 13 – 15 different kinds of licenses are required across a wide range of governmental agencies/ departments. Apart from the time and effort required to get these licenses, which could also vary depending on the state, the effort needed to renew and manage these is time consuming and is a pain.
3. MRP, do we need it? Had written about this earlier (http://v-rajesh.blogspot.com/2009/04/mrp-do-we-need-it.html ) and I think the time has come to do away with this or relook at its role. When significant investments are expected in Retail, be it the front end or the back end, the operators should be allowed to leverage pricing based on the other components of the value proposition. To force fit one price for all, disregarding costs of location, service, etc., is not viable in the long run.
4. Zoning and classification in cities is long overdue and in some cases only on paper. How will this help? The rental costs would be rationalized, especially as we seem to be heading towards a recovery and possible escalation of real estate prices again.

FDI or no FDI, the above four points need immediate attention and some forward thinking solutions if Retail as a sector needs to grow and thrive over a period of time.
Of course, some would include a 5th point of defining/ restricting sizes, formats and locations to protect the small kiranas. However, I don’t think that is feasible and anyways with proper zoning classifications this would be taken care of in a way. Also, if Kirana stores were accorded a status similar to small scale industries, they would fare better. Anyways, as I mentioned in another post of mine (http://v-rajesh.blogspot.com/2009/04/hidden-advantage.html), their cost structure gives them several inherent advantages and the only disadvantage they have is not being able to aggregate volumes.

Which brings me to an important point with regards to entrants waiting to leverage the opening up of FDI. It would be prudent to understand the Indian customers and focus on the backend more than the front end and this can be done immediately without waiting for FDI rules to change. Worse case scenario, such operators can leverage the supply chain that they invest in for the other Retailers.

Here is where understanding Indian consuming habits is crucial. It is no use focusing only of distribution centres, transportation, etc. This would address only 60% to 70% of the household consumption in terms of FMCG/ packaged products. Also, given the MRP scenario, there is a limit to how much value can be generated by focusing on the supply chain of these categories.

30% to 40% of Indian consumption is basic staples and grocery items as also fresh products. Significant work needs to be done in this sphere to extract value from the supply chain. Being dependent on the same wholesale/ semi-wholesale chain with marginal infrastructure at the tail end will not help. Paradigm changing initiatives like end to end cold chain, cooperative/ corporate farm, etc. needs to be explored and indulged in to extract the value that is present, but is now lost due to damages and intermediaries.

Indian consumers have already experienced and in most cases embraced the self service, modern formats. Therefore, the game changer for a new entrant would not be setting up another air conditioned store with maybe better facilities but in offering a significantly better value proposition. And for that, the key would be the back end.

In summary, FDI might be around the corner. But, to truly leverage that the government should look at making crucial changes and the operators should start working now in putting the infrastructure in place.

A Retailer's wish list to Mr. Modi

In the din created by the argument and debate about FDI in multi brand Retail, several key issues about Indian Retail is falling between the tables. The fact is that the largest constituent of this sector; the 12 to 14 million stand alone stores cannot be ignored in any policy decision.

However, these hardy, smart and extremely resourceful businessmen do not need pseudo protectionism but a whole series of policy initiatives which will empower them to grow and succeed.

Having been a part of the Indian retail story I have put down a list of things which would benefit the various constituents of the Indian Retail sector. The first in this wish list is granting of industry status for Retail and a whole set of policy directives built around the industry status.

Click here to read the complete “Retailer’s wish list to Mr. Modi”.

Ten years and counting!

March 2009, when I decided to start my blog “An Indian and A Retailer”, has definitely become a defining moment in my life journey. Ten years and 1,00,000 plus views later, the blog still continues to attract regular readers who often use its contents as a reference with regard to Indian Retail.

The blog started off as a simple repository of my experiences and learning in the Indian Retail space. It went on to become the foundation stone of my journey as an author. This blog led to my first book “The INDIAN reTALEs”. That was followed by “Out Of Syllabus”, “BREAK FREE” and the latest one, “The Ultimate Guide to SMART SHOPPING”. This has been in addition to the various articles I have written for leading business publications. 

All these must total up to approximately four lakh plus words over the years.

A BIG THANK YOU to all my readers who found my writing to be of interest and use. Many of them have given private feedback as also written public reviews. 

Two anecdotes are worth sharing as part of this milestone.

The first is about the actual start of my journey in writing. In 2000 after I had returned from the UK after completing the Chevening Scholarship, Business Line invited me to write an article. This was to be about my stint at ASDA and was titled “Making an elephant dance”. The article detailed the interesting practices that were followed at ASDA to keep their large number of employees engaged and nimble footed to remain customer centric. The blog, in a manner of speaking continued from where this article had led me in the journey of being an author.

The second one is about the name for my blog. It was a challenge as I was conflicted by various ideas and options. The final decision was influenced by using the two identities that I am most proud of and has defined me as a person. 

An Indian; growing up in the pre-liberalization period and witnessing the contribution that an individual can make as an ordinary citizen of India has always been motivating to me. Post liberalization, this has only been reinforced. In spite of several options to pursue a career abroad, the appeal of being an Indian contributing to the country’s growth in whatever small way possible has held greater appeal for me.

A Retailer; is how I think and operate. The experiences from this sector have defined my outlook and continue to do so. I am immensely grateful that God led me into this sector and am thankful to all my mentors who have taught me about the various facets about retail.

One of the topics I have written extensively about is that the retail sector in India should be granted industry status. This would not only spur this sector to faster and better growth but also contribute significantly to the Indian economy. My fond wish and hope as “An Indian and A Retailer”, is that this happens soon. I hope that the industry status is granted and a comprehensive policy for this sector, including both offline and online retailers gets rolled out at the earliest. 

That would be fantastic and something to look forward to.

Is Retail an avenue to propagate a language?

When we were opening India’s First Hypermarket in Hyderabad a fair amount of time was spent in deciding the content and more importantly the languages to use for the signages. Finally we settled on English, Telugu as also Hindi because we expected customers from across socio economic classes to come to the store and they needed to find directions in a language they were comfortable with. The key consideration for any Retail communication’s language has to be the customer and their comfort with the same.

Recently the authorities in Chennai have decreed that all Shop names must sport Tamil versions and that the Tamil version needs to be as big or as important as the English one. This is supposed to be done by June 1st 2010. Is this done with the customers in mind? More likely it is yet another half baked idea with a political agenda. Let me explain why I think so.

A government ration shop must sport a Tamil name as the customers might consist of people who are not conversant in English or not comfortable with that Language. A neighborhood supermarket in a predominantly North Indian Locality might do better to have signage in English and Hindi, while Tamil boards would mean little to the customers.

By the natural laws of market dynamics this is already in vogue amongst shops of all kinds and sizes. I have even seen stores near the Hyundai Factory near Chennai with Korean names in that languages script. Imagine having those stores, which cater to the Korean Expatriates, have boards sporting Tamil.

I am a big fan of vernacular language and have posted about why the staff in several Retail chains are being forced to communicate in English. But, I am a bigger fan of customer orientation and anything being done which is not customer oriented is a complete waste of time.

The effort and cost of altering or replacing boards could be channelized towards so many other productive purposes. But now, the poor Retailers will be busy wasting time and money towards this futile exercise. Yet another instance when the lack of an Industry status hurts the Retail segment as there is no one to take up their issues.

In my book “The INDIAN reTALEs” I have detailed how the Industry status is not only important for the Retail chains as many erroneously believe but more so for the 12 or 14 million odd outlets spread across in India. I hope that the book is read by the relevant people in the Government, who sit up. Take notice and act upon the ideas given.

2015 will be a year of D&C for Indian Retail

Yet another year has gone by and from many perspectives, it has been a memorable milestone in Indian history. Positive sentiment which was kicked off early in the year became firmed and translated into shoppers feeling confident enough to open up their wallets and spend freely.

From a purely Retail segment perspective, the big bang caused by online Retail cannot be forgotten easily. Whether it is the high decibel presence in media, the unbelievable sums of funding that seem to be flowing in from a bottomless well or for the matter the shopper angst when they could not buy or ended up getting bricks instead of the mobiles they had purchased.

There is a dialogue in the Tamil film Padayappa where Rajnikanth says to his nemesis – “You won once and it was good for me; I woke up“

I guess this is a very apt summary of the year gone by for Indian Retail which has been concerned about losing out to chain stores who are worried about losing out to Ecommerce and the shoppers who feel that they are at the losing end.

However, in the process physical stores have woken up to the potential as also the competition from online.  Ecommerce has woken up to the reality that Retail is not about high decibel advertising only and required on the ground execution. And finally, shoppers have woken up to the potential as also the downsides of deals which sound too good to be true.

The government now needs to wake up and grant industry status to Retail. 

So, what else can we expect in 2015?

The year ahead will be one of D&C; Disruption and Consolidation for Indian Retail. Click here to read more about this.

Taking Indian Retail to the next level

The main fall-out of the now defunct FDI decision by the cabinet is the heightened interest in Retail and large amounts of media space and time being devoted to this topic. As I have always maintained, the core issue of an Industry status is again lost amist this noise. Please Click Here to read a detailed article about the next stage of Indian Retail which has been published in Images Retail.

The FDI Decision

Late in the evening on the 24^th, I suddenly got a flurry of SMSes congratulating me about the FDI opening up for multi brand Retail. I was puzzled and also a bit amused. Puzzled because we are used to seeing many such decisions being watered down or even rolled back in the face of a larger issue where FDI regarding Retail might be sacrificed.

Amused, because of the premature celebratory mood. Of course the fact that the government has at least taken a stand now after going back and forth for years now is a cause to celebrate but is there enough in this cabinet decision for such an upbeat mood?

Well, I have my scepticism about this decision.

Firstly, the trend in the past few years has been the domination of coalition pressures on decisions. I will wait to see whether the adjournment of parliament extends to the next week and causes enough furore for any dilution or even roll back of this decision.

Second, this decision has already been announced with a major catch. The trade and commerce minister has gone on record stating that the final ground level implementation will be the state government’s prerogative because trade licenses, especially Shops & Establishment Act comes under their purview. What exactly does this mean? You are welcome to bring in big bucks, set up a corporate office and get a senior team in place. Then, go around to each chief minister to beg & plead to open stores?

Does this sound practical? In the current context only the Punjab CM has extended support to this decision. Most are silent and obviously some are vocal in their opposition. This has some very troubling implications.

Second are the various riders. Obviously the powers that be have very little clue about Retail and many of these conditions seem very food & grocery Retail specific. For example, take the clause of sourcing a third of products from 'micro and small industries’.  Take Toys as a category which hardly has any noticeable modern trade presence. If an international operator enters the country, 30% of their range has to be from local small scale industries or artisans. Sure, you can include the wooden toys of Srirangapatnam and a few such regional specialities. Will this add up to 30%? I don’t think so.

Does this enable at least the food and grocery formats properly? No. Take the other factor of 50% of  the investment needs to be in the back end. Contrast this with the reality of limitations like the APMC legislation, varied taxation and octroi, etc. What use will this back end be if there are other constraints that stop such chains from sourcing effectively?

What is the logic of limiting these operators to the top 50 odd towns based on population out of close to 8,000 towns in India? In fact this is an oxymoron to the arguments for allowing FDI in terms of employment generation. Should at least a part of these chains be mandated to open in regions which need local impetus? Then there will be overall growth of that region.

So, all I can say is so far so good. At least there is now a decision around which debate can be built and hopefully meaningful improvements to the policy made.

Lastly, there is an urgent need for experienced Indian Retailers to be involved in this and not only as providers as opinions. That would ensure some method to the madness and bring to fore a far more important and pressing matter.

When is Retail going to be accorded an Industry status?

Unleashing the Human Resource Potential in Retail

Coincidentally on the same day of my critique of the DIPP discussion note an exhaustive article of mine was carried in the “Brand Line” which is a supplement of “Business Line”.

Apart from detailing how Retail can harness India’s Human Resource potential, the article talks about how the same can have a significant impact on the Indian Economy. In a context where Retail is already amongst one of the largest employers in India contrasted with the reality that the majority of people employed would not even be paid minimum wages, Industry status is the most pressing need for Indian Retail.

The full article can be read online at Brand Line. 

A moment of disappointed irritation

The finance minister makes mention of a sector that contributes 8% to the GDP and I expectantly looked at the TV.

Yet again Retail whose size is as big and bigger than some other industries and also contributed approximately 8% to the GDP was left out in the cold.

Starting from simple expectations about offset of service tax to mammoth ones like industry status, the wish list was long. But was ignored.

Sad.

Policy Clarity required to enable Indian Retail

Trade in India is centuries old and historically the stories of our spices, etc., reaching many foreign shores, abound. From a historical perspective, it was these riches that attracted traders from overseas and the subsequent developments led to East India Company establishing a trading base first and then making India into its colony. This historical turn of events might have left a deep and long lasting imprint on the collective psyche which might be manifesting itself in the form of the vigorous and violent opposition to FDI in multi brand retail, today. 

Over the years we have largely seen shop keepers with a few exceptions where businesses managed a chain of stores. It is only from the mid 90s that Retail as a concept emerged in India. Understanding the differentiation between "Shop Keeping" and Retailing is very important. Their approach to business and priorities are completely different. Similarly clubbing eTail (Online Shopping) with eCommerce with regard to policy is incorrect.

As a start, Indian Retail needs Industry status and a cohesive approach with regard to policy-making and governance. My thoughts towards enabling the sector has been published as a Retail Report titled as "Six steps to redefining retail rules" in The Hindu Business Line. (Click on the link to read the article)

Is E-tail retailing or not?

E-Tail is a subset of retail and is largely about purchase of products (goods) online. However, the term e-commerce continues to be used for this segment. Apart from being misleading, this clearly is giving rise to policy approaches which disregards the aspects of a retail business which defines such e-tail operators.

If there is a defined FDI policy with regard to retail in India, there is no need for a separate policy and guidelines for e-tailing.

Yet, policy guidelines pertaining to e-tailing, wrongly described as e-commerce, keeps getting notified. The recent guidelines which came into effect from 1st February 2019, is a case in point.

Some points with regard to the dissonance created by guidelines pertaining to online shopping but defined as e-commerce have been explained in this article published in “The Hindu Business Line”. Click on this link to read the article titled, “The sting in the e-tail”.

The larger issue which is being conveniently ignored is industry status for the Retail Sector in India. Notifying this would not only help to streamline policy with regard to the various constituents of this sector but also enable the sector to growth.

Will this happen?