Indian Retail – Point & Counterpoint; The gain and pain from MRP

Once again my oft repeated grouse about which I have posted several times crops up again.

Times of India carried a news item titled “Chilled drinks drain the pocket as shops charge extra for power” and had the following chart which as part of this news report. This clearly shows how shops are selling soft drinks, juices, etc. at prices which are 10% to 25% more than MRP. Needless to say this is illegal and in February 2012 IRTC has been fined Rs. 10 Lakhs by New Delhi District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum.

 

 

Who benefits from MRP? Or rather the key question is who follows MRP?

Today MRP has become redundant and market dynamics defines pricing at the Retail end. The fact that a majority of shops in India sell many products above MRP and get away with it is ample proof that this legislation is outdated.

The typical counterpoint to this is how consumers are protected against being overcharged because of MRP.

Is that a valid statement? Not at all.
 

As consumers we all pay what the shop keeper asks whether it is below, on par or above the MRP. This is not restricted to only shops and the same reality exists in Hotels, Restaurants, Malls, Airports, etc. The only saving grace is that many of the corporate and larger entities today source products which has “For sale in select trade channels” printed on the product. This enables them to pursue a differential pricing which is invariably above the usual MRP.

Even in the above mentioned article a shop keeper is quoted as saying “I can't possibly charge more because if I do, then customers will walk into the supermarket a few meters away and buy the product there at MRP.”

Sure, IRTC has been fined for charging more than MRP. But, how many others have been penalized for flouting the MRP rule in spite of this being an open secret. Interestingly, the Judiciary seems to have a different perspective about MRP. In 2007 The Delhi High Court passed a judgment that hotels and restaurants can charge more than the MRP. This was justified in the ruling because such places provide ambience and services to their customers. However, this does not apply to shops and retail outlets.

I wonder why?

By this same logic the “cooling charge” is not illegal as it does constitute a “service”. Anyways, the stand alone stores do charge above MRP if possible and also gets away with it. By the same logic, the self service chains also provide service and ambiance and should therefore be exempt from the MRP rule.

So, who is then left to follow this out dated MRP concept? Therefore, if every channel has a reason and logic to charge more than MRP, why have this at all?

Click here to join the discussion on my page

Picture courtesy - Times of India, Chennai edition dated 10th March 2013

MRP; Do we need it?

Maximum Retail Price or MRP as we all know it is unique to our country. India is possibly amongst a handful of countries where the MRP system is in vogue. In fact if one were to do a Google search about MRP, you would mostly find links to material requirement planning!

MRP is the defined price above which any product cannot be sold. This is required as per the Weights and Measures Act as also for determining the Central Excise Duty. Initially the manufacturers had the option of printing this as a number without taxes or an all inclusive price including taxes. Subsequent to several instances where the ambiguity of “taxes extra” was misused to overcharge the customers, a standardized version of the MRP, inclusive of all taxes is more in vogue as of now.

There are 3 sides to this story.

• The excise duty to be paid by the manufacturer is calculated basis the MRP which has been declared. Why it cannot be calculated basis the selling price by the manufacturer to their dealers/ stockists is an interesting hypothesis. That’s a long story and starts with the socialistic/ license & high tax regime of yester years. Shall dwell upon that later. Suffice to say that the trust that the amount declared as the selling price is the correct figure is not there. It would not be feasible for manufacturers to print this on the products and hence there is always a doubt that the declared price might be lower than the actual price, hence lower tax realization. Sales Tax was also linked to MRP, thankfully we are moving away from that towards VAT.
• The manufacturers face an interesting challenge. Each state has their own set of taxes and rates for the same. Then how do they print the price inclusive of taxes? That’s the interesting part. My guess is that they have averaged out the taxes basis past sales trends and built that into the all inclusive number.
• The retailer, especially in the context of corporate retail has to live with this constraint of a MRP. Why a constraint? Simply put, this is the one constant in the operating environment when every other variable changes for the retailer. Hence it is near impossible to use pricing as an effective element of the value proposition.

In most of the countries the way the pricing system works is basis the purchase price plus market dynamics. Volumes enable the retailer to negotiate the buying price effectively and then decide how and where his margins should be invested, for optimum returns. For example the retailer might have stores in commercial/ high traffic areas like a station or an airport. This becomes possible because the retailer can charge more for his products as the value proposition is more of a convenience rather than savings. On the other hand in a large format, suburban store the rents are lower and that can be effectively utilized to offer lower prices to drive volume sales.

Funnily enough this system works in India too, but not for corporate retailers and definitely to the detriment of the consumers and the government. All of us have paid more for soft drinks or processed food at a station or an airport or in a mall. This happens all the while. So, where is the MRP? Technically we can file a complaint of overcharging and action would be taken against the person who sells above the MRP. But does that happen practically? Never.

Most operators often get away with this by ‘taking care’ of local officials or by getting around the system. They simply open the packaging and sell the product. In which case the weights and measures act is no longer applicable!

We had gone to a pizza outlet of an international chain and ordered including soft drinks. One of the persons did not want ice in the soft drink and preferred it at room temperature. The staff came back after some time and said that they could not serve the drink at room temperature. Upon prodding he confessed that the vending machine was out of order and they were serving the soft drinks from PET bottles which were all in the fridge and hence quite cold. We then requested him to get the PET and leave it outside for a while and we would have it once it had warmed up a bit. He again declined and said that he could only serve it in glasses.

After some thought I realized what the game was! A 2 litre PET bottle costs approximately Rs. 50/- as per the MRP. If I recall correctly a glass of soft drink was Rs. 30/- and would typically have 300 – 350 ml. Now do your math! That’s not taking into account the fact that the purchase price of that PET bottle would have been lesser than Rs. 50/-.

Nowadays such enforced profits are squeezed out of consumers under the pretext of security due to which one is not allowed to carry anything into malls, amusement parks, etc.

Only in a few instances have I seen the law being followed while compensating for the operational costs. The packaging clearly mentions that it has been specially packed, thereby differentiating itself from what is in the market.

So, the question is who does MRP benefit? Why should it not be scrapped?

In my view it benefits no one and least of all the consumer. Anyways, in today’s competitive environment the retail operators have to match prices and have to remain competitive. The conventional trade does not need this as their cost structure is fairly constant and definitely lesser than that of corporate retail.

So, why not remove this glass ceiling and allow free pricing. Especially when we are moving towards a consumer centric, free market environment, this should be amongst the first steps to be taken. Imagine a world without MRP. Imagine retailers being able to leverage one of the most important ‘P’s’ of marketing.

What is the need regarding MRP!

A few days ago I saw a quarter page advertisement highlighting MRP (the maximum retail price) and how complaints can be lodged, etc. etc., as you can see on the picture above.

I have always propagated doing away from MRP as the context has changed in India whether it is in urban or rural markets. MRP is no longer adhered to or relevant and the links to my other posts are as follows for reference.

- Do we need MRP?

- The MRP scam!

Now consider the following –

• In most places they charge more for soft drinks and claim it is for cooling! When most consumers are aware of this and pay up I wonder why no one from the Department of Consumer Affairs is aware of this reality.
• The same is the case in any monopolistic market context. Be it a multiplex, Hill Station, Tourist spots, etc. If you want something you end up paying whatever is named as the price. I wonder if the fact is that officials of this department are so hard working, they never frequent such places and are therefore unaware of such practices.
• Most of the overcharging happens in the vast network of railway stations and many airports. These are government run institutions. I wonder why no one has happened to notice this open disregard for the MRP?

I guess these Shop Keepers/ Retailers know the fact about market driven economy better than the Department of Consumer Affairs.

Especially in the Indian Context where filing complaints is easy but getting redressal or a solution is hardly if ever to be found, what is the purpose of such advertisements? Just blow up public money because it was allocated to this department in the budget???

In that context let me share a personal experience. For some weird reason voter id cards have been given to everyone in our apartment excepting our household. Multiple complaints to the local corporation and election commissioner’s cell did not have any result. Finally I filed an online complaint. All I have to show for all this is a nice pre printed post card saying that my complaint has been received and will be addressed soon by the corporation commissioner from the Chief Minister’s special cell. This came in 2009 and I am still waiting!!

How consumers think about retail pricing

In the retail context, communication of prices or offers is a fine mix of science and art. It is more of science because one needs to truly understand the consumer’s mind set. Understand is an understatement. It requires that the retailer get under the skin of the consumer and communicate, almost telepathically!

A simple way of communicating prices or offers is by stating the MRP and offer price, for the relevant pack size. However, the consumer does not always think in such a simplistic linear manner.

The consumer’s mind anchors the prices of a few products which are referred to as KVI’s (Known Value Items). The perception of value basis pricing is defined by the price communicated for such KVIs. Prices perceived to be lower than the benchmark price of a KVI leads one to believe that the store offers great prices and hence lots of savings. This is a classic example of the halo effect theory.

KVI’s as a concept is more relevant in a non-MRP scenario as there are no published prices on any product. However, in the Indian context this is very relevant for groceries, fruits and vegetables. Additionally, even with a MRP, the offer price or “Our Price” as many retailers say, is a powerful perception driver. Non Stick Tava at Rs. 149/-, when seen by a customer who is used to a price point of Rs. 250/- becomes a strong influence with regards to the pricing of that store.

Next is the pack size. Most of us are not mathematical wizards and prefer to be presented with numbers which don’t require my mind to do calculations and then be able to benchmark with my KVI.

Groceries, Fruits and Vegetables are usually benchmarked in per kilo basis, in our minds. Even though we might purchase lesser or more and never in exact multiples of a kilo, our minds pegs the per kilo price and we prefer to use that as a comparison.

I came across this offer communication recently and would like to take this as an example to drive home the point. If I were planning this communication, the following would be changed.

1. Price would be per kilo. The pack size price can be mentioned if required. But the per kilo price is more important.
2. Savings can still be basis the pack size, but should be mentioned clearly that this is for a 20 kg bag.
3. In groceries, fruits and vegetables the consumer does not think of MRP. The prices are dynamic and basis the market price. So, it might be a good idea to mention market price, then MRP (Only if required) and lastly Our price. If the pricing has been managed well, there should be a difference between market price and MRP itself, further reinforcing the price-value image.
4. Lastly, the savings if mentioned as a difference between Market Price and Our price would be even more powerful, if point 3 has been done.

Retail might appear simple and easy to do. It actually is. However, it requires a lot of common sense and a deep, instinctive understanding of the way consumers think.

Inside Retail; The great Indian MRP trick

One of my pet topics! 

During a session where I was explaining about MRP being irrelevant in the current market scenario, an interesting question/ counter point came up.

This point was - “MRP printed on a product gives the consumer some assurance about the price. If there was no MRP, what is the guarantee that retailers would not fleece the customers?”

The article “The great Indian MRP trick” answers this question as also reiterates that MRP as a concept is neither applicable universally nor is it being insisted upon and most definitely is enforced in very rare instances.

Please share your views and comments about this.

The MRP Scam !!

I have been writing and speaking a lot about the irrelevance of MRP and also how most establishments flout this rule with impunity.

See the scanned picture of the bill which illustrates the point.

Recently we went to a restaurant for dinner and ended up paying Rs. 125/- for a can of Diet Pepsi!

Most restaurants get around the MRP rule by serving the soft drinks in a glass and billing it as soft drink. Whereas in this place they happily brought the can to the table and have blatantly charged Diet Pepsi at almost 4 times the MRP!

Adding insult to injury is the fact that this is printed on a tax invoice. This means that such bills are supposedly inspected by the sales tax officials once in a way. Does that mean that the sales tax department is not aware of the MRP rule or in true bureaucratic style one arm of the government is not bothered about a violation with regard to another!

Intricacies of Indian Retail

This article of mine appeared in 'Retail &Leisure International', which is a UK based magazine in their Sept '09 issue.

The Indian market is a strong attraction for any marketer simply because of the vast consumer base. A population of billion plus, of which approximately a third live in urban areas and this is expected to go up to 40% by 2030. This is enough to make any enterprise worthwhile, especially retail and more so food retailing. Most international chains are looking at India keenly and waiting for the opening up of FDI eagerly to partake of this market opportunity.

However, there are several factors that an international operator needs to be aware of and more importantly build into their entry strategy, failing which, even after FDI opens up the going would not be smooth.

• Competition – Apart from the thousands of corporate chain stores that now dot the Indian Retailscape, there are approximately 12 million conventional outlets. Of these, roughly 60% to 70% are grocery stores and a third is in urban centers. Taking into account the geographical spread of India, this simply means that there are far more number of stores in cities and they continue to offer a compelling value proposition, fronted by convenience.
• Also, the conventional stores operate with a significant cost structure advantage as also generate far higher sales per sq. ft. because of their smaller size. Such stores would definitely not be able to generate higher margins as compared to chain stores, especially those who leverage global sourcing. However, the relatively higher sales and far lower cost structure would enable these stores to comfortably take on any competition in their stride. Therefore, any chain store would require a dual strategy to manage competition from other chain stores as also the large number of neighborhood conventional outlets.
• The Indian consumer – The consumer behavior is changing towards increased consumption and preference for a better lifestyle. However, the core sense of thrift and caution has not been eroded completely and the recent downturn has made these consumers more value driven. So pricing and promotions are not just important, they are crucial.
• Indian cities – Barring a few newer cities, most have grown and morphed over the years. A substantial part of this development happened without zoning laws and therefore the cities have residential areas interspersed with commercial development. It is only in the past few years that well defined residential suburbs have come about and even that has not completely removed residences from city centers. If a store wants to leverage all the relevant catchment areas, real estate costs are higher in most parts of a city. If the store network plans on averaging this by having stores in the emerging residential suburbs, the sales would usually be inverse to the rental and by that logic the average sales would be lower.
• Supply chain – The sheer physical spread of the country makes for a challenge with regards to supply chain. Compounding this is the current taxation and levies which does not allow for a distribution center network that can be planned basis distance alone. However, the recent budget proposal to implement GST by 2010 is a step in the right direction and would go a long way in enabling chains to plan more efficient supply chain system.
• Other statutory and legal framework constraints – Today a store needs to obtain as many as 20 – 30 different licenses to start operations and usually from different authorities. Similarly, there is a legislation called APMC act in most states which effectively prohibits direct procurement from farmers. Some cities levy an entry tax called Octroi, which indirectly forces a retailer to either set up a distribution center in a higher rent area within the city or incur higher transportation costs for store fills.
• MRP – Although there are many instances of price regulation in the retail sector across the world, I don’t think any other country enforces the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) rule. This price is printed on product and is applicable on all packaged products. This price is used to calculate certain taxes and manufacturers peg the margin structure with regards to this. As a corporate entity any chain store does not have the luxury of selling above this price and hence it acts like a glass ceiling. Even in high cost locations where the catchment might not be particularly bothered about the price, a retailer can sell only at MRP, whereas in price sensitive areas one is forced to discount, especially for KVIs.

I guess by now the reader would have concluded that my secret mission is to deter any international retailer from entering the Indian market. However, that is not the case. My intent is to portray a realistic picture that balances the huge market potential of Indian Retail with the ground realities that one would have to manage.

My suggestion to any international operator watching the Indian Retailscape with the intent of future entry would be to do so immediately leveraging the Cash & Carry route, simply because it is now immediately possible and would enable any retailer to build a ‘game changing’ back end infrastructure.

Take the food segment for example. It is no use focusing only on distribution centers, transportation, etc as an entry strategy. This would address only 60% to 70% of the household consumption in terms of CPG/ packaged products. Also, given the MRP scenario, there is a limit to how much value can be generated by focusing on the supply chain of these categories.

30% to 40% of Indian consumption is basic staples and grocery items as also fresh produce. Significant work needs to be done in this sphere to extract value from the supply chain. Being dependent on the same wholesale/ semi-wholesale chain with marginal infrastructure at the tail end will not help. Paradigm changing initiatives like end to end cold chain, cooperative/ corporate farm, etc. should be explored and indulged in to extract the value that is present, but is now lost due to damages and intermediaries. The APMC act not withstanding, such initiatives are possible and would provide a competitive edge to any retailer.

The game changer for a new entrant would not be setting up yet another store with maybe better facilities but in offering a significantly better value proposition. And for that, the key would be the back end.

Moving away from the food segment, several other product categories have not even been explored; Home Improvement being one. Housing being a key aspiration for Indians, the economic recovery will definitely see a boom in this sector. A retailer who understands the intricacies of Indian Retail would only stand to garner a major share of this boom.

In summary I would state that bring on the global best practices, but Indianize it for it to work, and it will.

Will FDI in Retail happen now?

With a clear majority and a free “hand”, the new government might want to implement some of the things which had to be compromised in the previous innings. One such was the allowing of FDI in Retail without strings such as single brand or cash & carry, etc. Most people in the Retail sector today expect that FDI in Retail would soon be allowed and this would help big developments and also bring in global expertise.

A couple of points in my mind about this development and the expectations from such an outcome –

1. Industry status for Retail is required immediately, thereby enabling Retail to avail various benefits from this. This would do much in addressing several issues related to licensing, statutory matters and more importantly access to credit.
2. Regardless of the industry status, licensing requirements for Retail should be streamlined and unified. Today, depending on the range of products one has in a store as many as 13 – 15 different kinds of licenses are required across a wide range of governmental agencies/ departments. Apart from the time and effort required to get these licenses, which could also vary depending on the state, the effort needed to renew and manage these is time consuming and is a pain.
3. MRP, do we need it? Had written about this earlier (http://v-rajesh.blogspot.com/2009/04/mrp-do-we-need-it.html ) and I think the time has come to do away with this or relook at its role. When significant investments are expected in Retail, be it the front end or the back end, the operators should be allowed to leverage pricing based on the other components of the value proposition. To force fit one price for all, disregarding costs of location, service, etc., is not viable in the long run.
4. Zoning and classification in cities is long overdue and in some cases only on paper. How will this help? The rental costs would be rationalized, especially as we seem to be heading towards a recovery and possible escalation of real estate prices again.

FDI or no FDI, the above four points need immediate attention and some forward thinking solutions if Retail as a sector needs to grow and thrive over a period of time.
Of course, some would include a 5th point of defining/ restricting sizes, formats and locations to protect the small kiranas. However, I don’t think that is feasible and anyways with proper zoning classifications this would be taken care of in a way. Also, if Kirana stores were accorded a status similar to small scale industries, they would fare better. Anyways, as I mentioned in another post of mine (http://v-rajesh.blogspot.com/2009/04/hidden-advantage.html), their cost structure gives them several inherent advantages and the only disadvantage they have is not being able to aggregate volumes.

Which brings me to an important point with regards to entrants waiting to leverage the opening up of FDI. It would be prudent to understand the Indian customers and focus on the backend more than the front end and this can be done immediately without waiting for FDI rules to change. Worse case scenario, such operators can leverage the supply chain that they invest in for the other Retailers.

Here is where understanding Indian consuming habits is crucial. It is no use focusing only of distribution centres, transportation, etc. This would address only 60% to 70% of the household consumption in terms of FMCG/ packaged products. Also, given the MRP scenario, there is a limit to how much value can be generated by focusing on the supply chain of these categories.

30% to 40% of Indian consumption is basic staples and grocery items as also fresh products. Significant work needs to be done in this sphere to extract value from the supply chain. Being dependent on the same wholesale/ semi-wholesale chain with marginal infrastructure at the tail end will not help. Paradigm changing initiatives like end to end cold chain, cooperative/ corporate farm, etc. needs to be explored and indulged in to extract the value that is present, but is now lost due to damages and intermediaries.

Indian consumers have already experienced and in most cases embraced the self service, modern formats. Therefore, the game changer for a new entrant would not be setting up another air conditioned store with maybe better facilities but in offering a significantly better value proposition. And for that, the key would be the back end.

In summary, FDI might be around the corner. But, to truly leverage that the government should look at making crucial changes and the operators should start working now in putting the infrastructure in place.

Smart Shopper Series

One of the key feedbacks about “The INDIAN reTALEs” was that it was so informative to the shopper/ consumer. The inside workings and what Retail was all about seemed to help people become better shoppers. As mentioned in the book, we are all not equipped/ educated or taught to shop or make purchases. So, inputs that teach us how Retail works also help us become better shoppers and indirectly make Retailers improve as expectations go up.

In that context I have started a series of articles titled as Smart Shopper Series for The Hindu Retail Plus. These articles would help educate people about becoming smarter shoppers.

The first two articles came out over the past few weeks and the links are as follows –

- What is MRP?

- What is FIFO?

I was held up in many things including addressing a Youth Leadership Camp and could not share these links before. Shall share the future links promptly.

Please do forward these links to all your contacts and help them become Smarter Shoppers.